Added SqlBulkCopy.RowsCopied property to docs

[stylesm]

Added the RowsCopied property to docs for SqlBulkCopy, which was added in System.Data.SqlClient 2.0.0.

See dotnet/SqlClient#409.

[dnfadmin]

All CLA requirements met.

[opbld32]

Docs Build status updates of commit 4b391b2:

❌ Validation status: errors

Please follow instructions here which may help to resolve issue.

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.Data.SqlClient/SqlBulkCopy.xml	❌Error		Details

xml/System.Data.SqlClient/SqlBulkCopy.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Error-ECMA2Yaml_Framework_NotFound] Unable to find framework info for P:System.Data.SqlClient.SqlBulkCopy.RowsCopied

For more details, please refer to the build report.

If you see build warnings/errors with permission issues, it might be due to single sign-on (SSO) enabled on Microsoft's GitHub organizations. Please follow instructions here to re-authorize your GitHub account to Docs Build.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching in the Docs contributor and Admin Guide
• See the frequently asked questions
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[carlossanlop]

Thanks for your contribution, @stylesm, but we are not supposed to add full xml elements manually. We have tooling that detects new APIs from the latest ref assemblies, and then the Docs build system generates the xmls automatically based on that information.

@safern does your batch of ref assemblies include the SqlClient ones?

[safern]

@safern does your batch of ref assemblies include the SqlClient ones?

No I currently don't include SqlClient. We would need to add it to our drop items in our api-docs infra repo. I guess we would add it as part of extensions.