Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

React to corefx changes #326

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 8, 2018
Merged

React to corefx changes #326

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 8, 2018

Conversation

pakrym
Copy link

@pakrym pakrym commented Mar 8, 2018

No description provided.

@pakrym pakrym requested a review from davidfowl March 8, 2018 17:09
@pakrym pakrym force-pushed the feature/pk-corefx0 branch from ffae512 to cd04314 Compare March 8, 2018 17:11
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@

namespace System.IO.Pipelines.Tests
{
public class BufferWriterTes: IDisposable
public class BufferWriterTes : IDisposable

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: BufferWriterTes => BufferWriterTests

if (currentCount <= 0) ThrowHelper.ThrowInvalidOperationException_ReferenceCountZero();
if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref _referenceCount, currentCount - 1, currentCount) == currentCount)
{
// TODO: this needs to be changed to 1 when get Pipelines with pool fix.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we tracking this somewhere?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did change it to 1, just forgot to remove the comment.

@pakrym pakrym force-pushed the feature/pk-corefx0 branch from cd04314 to 3457833 Compare March 8, 2018 20:45
@pakrym pakrym requested a review from halter73 March 8, 2018 20:56
@pakrym pakrym merged commit 62018e3 into dev Mar 8, 2018
@natemcmaster natemcmaster deleted the feature/pk-corefx0 branch October 25, 2018 00:26
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 30, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants