You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As part of PR #33648, I lowered our expectations for how long of a fluent call we can handle (commit a5bc25a).
I didn't manage to figure out which part of the PR might cause this change (greater stack usage during binding).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The change to move nullable to a two state solution inadverntently
changed how the CLR inlines a number of method calls. The combination of
not-inlining and over-inlining caused us to have a much larger "frame"
for analyzing a fluent call and exceeded our tolerance levels.
This adjusts the inlining so that we get the same results as before.
closesdotnet#33775
As part of PR #33648, I lowered our expectations for how long of a fluent call we can handle (commit a5bc25a).
I didn't manage to figure out which part of the PR might cause this change (greater stack usage during binding).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: