Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review potential code paths that may or may not need to handle record structs #53631

Closed
6 tasks done
Youssef1313 opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed
6 tasks done

Comments

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member

Youssef1313 commented May 23, 2021

The order of this list is from things I'm more confident about to things I'm less confident about.








@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added Area-Compilers untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead labels May 23, 2021
@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member Author

@jcouv. Feel free to move the appropriate parts of this issue to the test plan and close the issue, or keep it open and link it from the test plan. I'm fine either way.

@jcouv
Copy link
Member

jcouv commented May 23, 2021

It's fine to keep as an issue. Thanks for digging those up.
Linking to test plan #51199

@jinujoseph jinujoseph added Concept-Continuous Improvement untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead and removed untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead labels May 25, 2021
@jaredpar jaredpar added New Language Feature - Records Records Bug and removed untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead labels Jul 13, 2021
@jaredpar jaredpar added this to the 17.0 milestone Jul 13, 2021
@jcouv
Copy link
Member

jcouv commented Sep 17, 2021

All bullets were addressed. Closing

@jcouv jcouv closed this as completed Sep 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants