Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add public IsInitOnly API and use it to fix code generation of 'init' #44077

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 13, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ public override void VisitProperty(IPropertySymbol symbol)

private static bool IsInitOnly(IMethodSymbol symbol)
{
// PROTOTYPE(init-only): adjust SymbolDisplayVisitor once we have a public IsInitOnly API
return (symbol as Symbols.PublicModel.MethodSymbol)?.UnderlyingMethodSymbol.IsInitOnly == true;
return symbol?.IsInitOnly == true;
}

private void AddPropertyNameAndParameters(IPropertySymbol symbol)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -139,6 +139,14 @@ bool IMethodSymbol.IsReadOnly
}
}

bool IMethodSymbol.IsInitOnly
{
get
{
return _underlying.IsInitOnly;
}
}

IMethodSymbol IMethodSymbol.OriginalDefinition
{
get
Expand Down
Loading