Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a Razor language server cohosted in Roslyn #70819
Create a Razor language server cohosted in Roslyn #70819
Changes from 17 commits
821420b
079c504
223d01b
342d5de
f1ed068
3c3d285
38bffad
1db5ad9
464e873
b93538b
af6b3ab
06f72e9
bc1768f
8c3c4a9
0cc3ac8
ad0302f
789c5cc
da42b86
c537048
28b837f
97689b5
64fa385
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing this to call
GetTextDocuments
seemed overly wasteful given only project info is needed, so I changed this handler a bit. Mainly wanted to avoid callingGetDocument
andGetAdditionalDocument
on every Id (and this endpoint is called a fair bit)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So trying to understand the steps here
Does that sound right? Potentially we can also skip 2) entirely if requests about C# are converted to non-LSP entirely before 3?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Item 2 hadn't really occurred to me, but I guess we could do that. Without dynamic registration though, we probably can't do that behind a feature flag though, as it would just be controlled by the content type attribute on the server. Interesting idea though.
The rest is correct though. Essentially this lets us work on migration, find bugs, maybe get some benefit, but without being blocked on dynamic registration.