-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Partial properties: misc compiler layer work #73527
Merged
RikkiGibson
merged 11 commits into
dotnet:features/partial-properties
from
RikkiGibson:partial-properties-7
May 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
41537a9
Doc comments
RikkiGibson f22f08d
extern scenarios
RikkiGibson 9bfeade
cleanup prototypes. add compilation events test.
RikkiGibson 6a79b2e
Check LangVersion
RikkiGibson b2e714a
fix MessageID.RequiredVersion
RikkiGibson 950eca1
Fix doc comment tests
RikkiGibson ff5ea82
Fix extern tests on net472
RikkiGibson 5912984
Test doc comment cases for decl without impl
RikkiGibson 9eb3524
Address feedback
RikkiGibson c085c3f
Address feedback
RikkiGibson 33cc9c0
Apply suggestions from code review
RikkiGibson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if this existing check is actually correct for partial symbols that can't skip implementation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would be concerned about a scenario like this: (SharpLab for analogous method scenario)
Thankfully I think the
!_isForSingleSymbol
logic on line 288 (at time of writing this comment) ensures that Quick Info does show a doc comment here. We could add a test.