SunOS process and thread support

[gwr]

Read binary psinfo for System.Diagnostic.Process on SunOS (Solaris or illumos).
No failures in System.Diagnostic.Process.Tests (but lots of skip)

BTW, I tried rebasing on main from Mon. this week and ran into problems downloading stuff.
Not sure why, but it didn't seem to have anything to do with my changes.

[dotnet-policy-service]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-diagnostics-process
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

[am11]

Lets drop the changes which are already submitted in other PRs.

[am11]

Good start! I've left initial feedback, which I anticipate the maintainers will point out. :)

[gwr]

Good start! I've left initial feedback, which I anticipate the maintainers will point out. :)

Thanks. I had not yet seen #105207 when I opened this. I think @AustinWise and I should figure out how to get the prerequisite fixes shown there (and here) all integrated, and then I'll rebase the last parts of this onto that.

[gwr]

Lets drop the changes which are already submitted in other PRs.

I'd love to, but I do not see a way to do "stacked" PRs, where one PR targets the branch of another PR.
If I drop the prerequisite changes then things break. Suggestions welcome.

[am11]

Create a local branch feature/illumos-port with all the miscellaneous changes. Then keep this branch only for System.Diagnostics.Port changes. You can git cherry-pick <spaces-separated commit hashes> across the branches.

[AustinWise]

The C# for reading from procfs and enumerating threads/processes looks good to me.

[gwr]

Rebased and squashed

[am11]

Looks good to me. Thanks for this @gwr! This is one major step to complete the shared framework on illumos-x64 and enabling msbuild/sdk. 👍

@adamsitnik, @jkotas, PTAL.

[am11]

@gwr fyi, we are not required to rebase for every commit merging in main branch. It's rather a busy repo so GH will likely always show you that your branch is behind by X number of commits. The maintainers can do the rebase if deemed necessary.

[gwr]

Updated to fix a comment (nit)

[gwr]

@gwr fyi, we are not required to rebase for every commit merging in main branch. It's rather a busy repo so GH will likely always show you that your branch is behind by X number of commits. The maintainers can do the rebase if deemed necessary.

OK, thanks. Won't do it too often.

[gwr]

Here too; Can anyone tell me what to do about the runtime checks that reported failure?

[jkotas]

Can anyone tell me what to do about the runtime checks that reported failure?

Don't worry about them. They are not related to your change.

[gwr]

nudge 2

[gwr]

nudge 3

[adamsitnik]

Please excuse me for lack of response, I am busy fixing some last minute bugs for .NET 9. I should be less busy after the RC2 branch snap next week and I hope to be able to review it then.