-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release/9.0] Backport some PACKAGE.md files #107724
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Provide System.Composition package readme * Fix empty lines
* Provide System.Composition.Convention package readme * Improve after feedback
* Provide System.Composition.Hosting package readme * Improve after feedback
* Provide System.Composition.Runtime package readme * Improve after feedback
* Provide System.Composition.TypedParts package readme * Improve after feedback
* Provide System.CodeDom package readme * Add remark about Roslyn/.NET Compiler SDK * Update src/libraries/System.CodeDom/src/PACKAGE.md --------- Co-authored-by: Buyaa Namnan <buyankhishig.namnan@microsoft.com>
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
the
needs-area-label
An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners
label
Sep 11, 2024
buyaa-n
requested review from
jeffhandley,
steveharter,
ViktorHofer,
ericstj and
artl93
September 11, 2024 23:51
buyaa-n
added
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
area-Meta
and removed
needs-area-label
An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners
labels
Sep 11, 2024
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta |
This was referenced Sep 12, 2024
ericstj
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
I think we can consider this tell-mode. |
carlossanlop
added
Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Sep 12, 2024
carlossanlop
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
artl93
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
/ba-g The failures are unrelated to the packaging updates in this PR |
jeffhandley
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #106443, #106781, #106782, #106783, #106784, #106785, #107372 to release/9.0
/cc @ericstj @jeffhandley
Customer Impact
Customer impact from the The Add package readmes to shipping libraries packages issue:
The issue is planned for 9.0 and this PR is porting the PRs that is recently merged to main and not made to 9.0 branch
Regression
This is doc only change
Testing
NA, doc only change
Risk
Minimum, doc only change