Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] ARM64-SVE: Fix hwintrinsics flags #107802

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Backport of #107791 to release/9.0

/cc @kunalspathak @a74nh

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

While refactoring some code in LSRA, we found that some of the flags on SVE intrinsics were incorrect. This could lead to asserts or worse functional correctness issues. We fixed this by fixing the flags.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

The flags were added when the SVE intrinsics were implemented.

Testing

We have ran all the SVE tests (including stress tests).

Risk

Low: This only affects SVE area which is marked as Experimental.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Sep 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@kunalspathak kunalspathak added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2024
@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT PTAL

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. please get a code review. we can merge when ready

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 13, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

@amanasifkhalid @JulieLeeMSFT today is the snap, please take a look at the PR failures

@kunalspathak
Copy link
Member

failure seems to be #107254

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT the test failure is #107254, which Build Analysis is tracking. Build Analysis isn't listing any unknown failures, so I don't know why it's red...

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

/ba-g all failures are known

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT merged commit ef70a34 into release/9.0 Sep 16, 2024
10 of 16 checks passed
@jkotas jkotas deleted the backport/pr-107791-to-release/9.0 branch September 18, 2024 21:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants