Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[automated] Merge branch 'release/9.0-rc2' => 'release/9.0' #108006

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 19, 2024

MERGE COMMIT

I detected changes in the release/9.0-rc2 branch which have not been merged yet to release/9.0. I'm a robot and am configured to help you automatically keep release/9.0 up to date, so I've opened this PR.

This PR merges commits made on release/9.0-rc2 by the following committers:

  • dotnet-maestro[bot]
  • github-actions[bot]
  • adamsitnik

Instructions for merging from UI

This PR will not be auto-merged. When pull request checks pass, complete this PR by creating a merge commit, not a squash or rebase commit.

merge button instructions

If this repo does not allow creating merge commits from the GitHub UI, use command line instructions.

Instructions for merging via command line

Run these commands to merge this pull request from the command line.

git fetch
git checkout release/9.0-rc2
git pull --ff-only
git checkout release/9.0
git pull --ff-only
git merge --no-ff release/9.0-rc2

# If there are merge conflicts, resolve them and then run git merge --continue to complete the merge
# Pushing the changes to the PR branch will re-trigger PR validation.
git push https://github.com/dotnet/runtime HEAD:merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0
or if you are using SSH
git push git@github.com:dotnet/runtime HEAD:merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0

After PR checks are complete push the branch

git push

Instructions for resolving conflicts

⚠️ If there are merge conflicts, you will need to resolve them manually before merging. You can do this using GitHub or using the command line.

Instructions for updating this pull request

Contributors to this repo have permission update this pull request by pushing to the branch 'merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0'. This can be done to resolve conflicts or make other changes to this pull request before it is merged.

git checkout -b merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0 release/9.0
git pull https://github.com/dotnet/runtime merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0
(make changes)
git commit -m "Updated PR with my changes"
git push https://github.com/dotnet/runtime HEAD:merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0
or if you are using SSH
git checkout -b merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0 release/9.0
git pull git@github.com:dotnet/runtime merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0
(make changes)
git commit -m "Updated PR with my changes"
git push git@github.com:dotnet/runtime HEAD:merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0

Contact .NET Core Engineering (dotnet/dnceng) if you have questions or issues.
Also, if this PR was generated incorrectly, help us fix it. See https://github.com/dotnet/arcade/blob/main/.github/workflows/scripts/inter-branch-merge.ps1.

adamsitnik and others added 7 commits September 17, 2024 16:06
* [NRBF] Don't use Unsafe.As when decoding DateTime(s) (#105749)

* Add NrbfDecoder Fuzzer (#107385)

* [NRBF] Fix bugs discovered by the fuzzer (#107368)

* bug #1: don't allow for values out of the SerializationRecordType enum range

* bug #2: throw SerializationException rather than KeyNotFoundException when the referenced record is missing or it points to a record of different type

* bug #3: throw SerializationException rather than FormatException when it's being thrown by BinaryReader (or sth else that we use)

* bug #4: document the fact that IOException can be thrown

* bug #5: throw SerializationException rather than OverflowException when parsing the decimal fails

* bug #6: 0 and 17 are illegal values for PrimitiveType enum

* bug #7: throw SerializationException when a surrogate character is read (so far an ArgumentException was thrown)
# Conflicts:
#	src/libraries/System.Formats.Nrbf/src/System/Formats/Nrbf/NrbfDecoder.cs

* [NRBF] throw SerializationException when a surrogate character is read (#107532)

 (so far an ArgumentException was thrown)

* [NRBF] Fuzzing non-seekable stream input (#107605)

* [NRBF] More bug fixes (#107682)

- Don't use `Debug.Fail` not followed by an exception (it may cause problems for apps deployed in Debug)
- avoid Int32 overflow
- throw for unexpected enum values just in case parsing has not rejected them
- validate the number of chars read by BinaryReader.ReadChars
- pass serialization record id to ex message
- return false rather than throw EndOfStreamException when provided Stream has not enough data
- don't restore the position in finally 
- limit max SZ and MD array length to Array.MaxLength, stop using LinkedList<T> as List<T> will be able to hold all elements now
- remove internal enum values that were always illegal, but needed to be handled everywhere
- Fix DebuggerDisplay

* [NRBF] Comments and bug fixes from internal code review (#107735)

* copy comments and asserts from Levis internal code review

* apply Levis suggestion: don't store Array.MaxLength as a const, as it may change in the future

* add missing and fix some of the existing comments

* first bug fix: SerializationRecord.TypeNameMatches should throw ArgumentNullException for null Type argument

* second bug fix: SerializationRecord.TypeNameMatches should know the difference between SZArray and single-dimension, non-zero offset arrays (example: int[] and int[*])

* third bug fix: don't cast bytes to booleans

* fourth bug fix: don't cast bytes to DateTimes

* add one test case that I've forgot in previous PR
# Conflicts:
#	src/libraries/System.Formats.Nrbf/src/System/Formats/Nrbf/SerializationRecord.cs

* [NRBF] Address issues discovered by Threat Model  (#106629)

* introduce ArrayRecord.FlattenedLength

* do not include invalid Type or Assembly names in the exception messages, as it's most likely corrupted/tampered/malicious data and could be used as a vector of attack.

* It is possible to have binary array records have an element type of array without being marked as jagged

---------

Co-authored-by: Buyaa Namnan <bunamnan@microsoft.com>
…nce-packages (#107939)

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/source-build-reference-packages build 20240917.3

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.source-build-reference-packages
 From Version 9.0.0-alpha.1.24466.2 -> To Version 9.0.0-alpha.1.24467.3

* Bump private intellisense version

---------

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Sánchez López <1175054+carlossanlop@users.noreply.github.com>
…16.4 (#107935)

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24464.3 -> To Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24466.4

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…05 (#107950)

Co-authored-by: Jeff Handley <jeffhandley@users.noreply.github.com>
…916.2 (#107948)

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.arcade , Microsoft.DotNet.Arcade.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Archives , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Feed , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Installers , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Packaging , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.TargetFramework , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Templating , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Workloads , Microsoft.DotNet.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.DotNet.GenAPI , Microsoft.DotNet.GenFacades , Microsoft.DotNet.Helix.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.PackageTesting , Microsoft.DotNet.RemoteExecutor , Microsoft.DotNet.SharedFramework.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.VersionTools.Tasks , Microsoft.DotNet.XliffTasks , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitAssert , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitConsoleRunner , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions
 From Version 9.0.0-beta.24463.2 -> To Version 9.0.0-beta.24466.2

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ar processing (#107942)

* Replace VectorXx.Exp's edge case fallback with scalar processing

The better, vectorized fix is more complex and can be done for .NET 10.

* Revert addition to Helpers.IsEqualWithTolerance

---------

Co-authored-by: Stephen Toub <stoub@microsoft.com>
….2 (#107960)

Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.ICU.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24466.2 -> To Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24467.2

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

1 similar comment
Copy link

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

github-actions bot and others added 2 commits September 18, 2024 19:59
This symbol should be defined/not defined instead of defined as 0 or 1.

Fixes commit info for when running dotnet --info.

Co-authored-by: Jeremy Koritzinsky <jekoritz@microsoft.com>
…18.8 (#108001)

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24466.4 -> To Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24468.8

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 19, 2024
@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 23, 2024

/ba-g release branch

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 25, 2024

/ba-g release branch

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 1b7ce8b into release/9.0 Sep 26, 2024
155 of 159 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the merge/release/9.0-rc2-to-release/9.0 branch September 26, 2024 19:04
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow new-api-needs-documentation Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants