-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extract bundled files when IncludeAllContentForSelfExtract is set #42435
Merged
Merged
Changes from 17 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a2feaec
Extract bundled files when IncludeAllContentForSelfExtract is set
83a1109
Don't pass bundle probe to the runtime for netcoreapp3 compat mode
fab74ef
Bundle probe should not report extracted files
vitek-karas 788e046
CodeBaseThrows should fail
459c10e
Normalize app base path
vitek-karas 2917ca5
Merge branch 'netCoreApp3Compat' of https://github.com/mateoatr/runti…
vitek-karas 42bc99b
Search for CoreLib in TPA
vitek-karas 02b975d
Merge pull request #2 from vitek-karas/CoreLibFromTPA
mateoatr ac2b539
PR feedback
vitek-karas fe7c2cd
Fix bundle tests to actually test single-file bundles
vitek-karas 9334a7d
Don't use Microsoft.NETCore.App.Internal package
elinor-fung 9289687
AppWithSubDirs: add back RuntimeIdentifier, don't use .Internal package
elinor-fung fcc222f
Remove unused method
vitek-karas 48563cf
Keep deps.json in APP_CONTEXT_DEPS_FILES for .NET Core 3.x compat mode
7595e5f
Only expect app.deps.json
9449607
Adapt to recent test changes
vitek-karas e52837c
Rework the single-file API tests for better coverage
vitek-karas 7ec7fd3
Fix the reported path to .deps.json for back compat mode
vitek-karas 19ea932
Fix a test bug on Linux
vitek-karas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we exclude the .ni.dll here? I wonder if that's correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
dllOnly
is currently only set totrue
when searching for System.Private.CoreLib (in the added fallback logic), so I believe the handling of it was more targeted to avoiding extra work in that scenario of just looking for .dll and not .ni.dll. For longer term / 6.0, I expect it will be refactored away per #42435 (comment).