Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/6.0-preview7] Update dependencies from dotnet/emsdk #55785

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk

  • Subscription: c93f870d-65c9-43c9-c6f5-08d93c0982c9
  • Build: 20210715.2
  • Date Produced: 7/15/2021 11:42 PM
  • Commit: 16140a192ea2ffd8bcc3af09f6e531b3f5a7522b
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/6.0-preview7

…15.2

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Manifest-6.0.100
 From Version 6.0.0-preview.7.21364.1 -> To Version 6.0.0-preview.7.21365.2
@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Jul 16, 2021

This a branch package version only change 😩

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Jul 16, 2021

cc @Anipik

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Jul 19, 2021

This is a zero code change PR that will help coherency, can someone who is authorized please commit it.

cc @mmitche @Anipik

@Anipik Anipik merged commit 6495f51 into release/6.0-preview7 Jul 19, 2021
@Anipik Anipik deleted the darc-release/6.0-preview7-4d0142e4-dc77-4409-a6e4-f1129c258107 branch July 19, 2021 20:42
@danmoseley danmoseley added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Jul 28, 2021
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants