-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove optimizeForReading overloads from FrozenDictionary/Set #87988
Conversation
We initially added these as a mitigation primarily for construction potentially being super slow. Now that enough optimization has been done to mitigate those performance concerns, we can get rid of the original mitgation and just have the surface area we initially wanted.
Note regarding the This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change. |
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-collections Issue DetailsWe initially added these as a mitigation primarily for construction potentially being super slow. Now that enough optimization has been done to mitigate those performance concerns, we can get rid of the original mitgation and just have the surface area we initially wanted. Contributes to #77891
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, !
@stephentoub is there any chance you know the code size difference?
With improvements since the last time I measured months ago, it's improved a lot. Each |
Added When you commit this breaking change:
Tagging @dotnet/compat for awareness of the breaking change. |
We initially added these as a mitigation primarily for construction potentially being super slow. Now that enough optimization has been done to mitigate those performance concerns, we can get rid of the original mitgation and just have the surface area we initially wanted.
Contributes to #77891
Closes #87633