Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert Volatile to JIT intrinsics #88073

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

MichalPetryka
Copy link
Contributor

Removes big VM implementations and improves codegen.

@ghost ghost added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Jun 26, 2023
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 26, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 26, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Removes big VM implementations and improves codegen.

Author: MichalPetryka
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr, community-contribution

Milestone: -

Copy link
Member

@EgorBo EgorBo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice diffs, the jit side LGTM, @jkotas can you please check the vm side?

Copy link
Member

@jkotas jkotas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The VM side looks great!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants