Replies: 6 comments 10 replies
-
|
Sounds good to me @chmorgan, we'd have to decide on a suitable name though 🙂 BTW, one problem with the connections library is the license, it's not as friendly as packetnet, which I think is main problem when you have two projects that belong so closely together. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Good proposal, no objections from my side. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Totally fine with adjusting the license to match. I think I’m the only one
with code in that library. We use mpl for packetdotnet net today right?
…On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:57 PM PhyxionNL ***@***.***> wrote:
Sounds good to me @chmorgan <https://github.com/chmorgan>, we'd have to
decide on a suitable name though 🙂
BTW, one problem with the connections library is the license, it's not as
friendly as packetnet, which I think is main problem when you have two
projects that belong so closely together.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#325 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJH4AFIAJP4R6TRG5335BTUDNL7FANCNFSM5EUDTVDQ>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, MPL 2.0 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Any thoughts on a team/project name or whatever GitHub calls them?
…On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:09 PM Ayoub Kaanich ***@***.***> wrote:
Good proposal, no objections from my side.
Just make sure to update all links (including the ones in awesome dotnet).
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#325 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJH4AHCOH5M6XSLL3HPPQ3UDN3P5ANCNFSM5EUDTVDQ>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
it's called an organization, some choose to have the project name as organization name, like sharppcap/sharppcap |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe packetcapture (packetcap already exists) as a combination of packetdotnet and sharppcap? I don't really have any other ideas. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@kayoub5 any ideas on organization names? sharpcapture? packetcapture (from PhyxionNL)? dotcapture dotcap ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
dotcap => no, would confuse with libcap => Linux capability lib I would go for one of below:
others sound too long or not catchy enough. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We’d be rolling packetdotnet under this as well I think.
…On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 2:49 PM Ayoub Kaanich ***@***.***> wrote:
dotcap => no, would confuse with libcap => Linux capability lib
I would go for one of below:
- having the org name "sharppcap" like
https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog and
https://github.com/danger/danger
- dotpcap (*dot*net *pcap* group)
- ironpcap some .NET libraries/group use the prefix iron when porting
something to .NET, see
https://github.com/search?l=C%23&o=desc&p=1&q=iron&s=stars&type=Repositories
others sound too long or not catchy enough.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#325 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJH4AAB57TZ3ZC3ZQVA4YLUIGW2ZANCNFSM5EUDTVDQ>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@PhyxionNL any comments on the proposed names? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don't have a strong opinion on a name. I think it would be useful to group both projects under one organization for visibility, so a name that somewhat combines both sound like a good idea. dotpcap would be fine I guess. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@kayoub5, @PhyxionNL dotpcap work? If so I'll set up that org and move the projects over. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yup, sounds good |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Sounds good to me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@kayoub5 @PhyxionNL repositories have been transferred and you guys are part of the dotpcap organization. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey @kayoub5, @PhyxionNL. Thoughts on moving sharppcap, PacketDotNet, and packetdotnet-connections under some higher level team/project to reflect that they are a suite of libraries that can work together?
It seems like people are unaware of packetdotnet-connections for example, and if we had a diagram showing the layers and what they did, sharppcap on capture/send, PacketDotNet on low level, connections leveraging PacketDotNet, it could be easier for people to follow.
And with you helping out and my desire for the libraries to live on it might make sense to shift them out from under my GitHub account both to reflect your participation and to decentralize management.
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions