Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update main_v9.1-ref after 1572 (v9.1.1 release) #1578

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

JohnHalleyGotway
Copy link
Collaborator

Requesting to update the contents of main_v9.1-ref with the latest version of main_v9.1. The NB failed, as expected, after doing the v9.1.1 release. The test scripts do not know how to handle version differences in the output from MTD.

Pull Request Testing

  • Describe testing already performed for these changes:

    I inspected the diffs flagged in:
    kiowa:/d1/projects/MET/MET_regression/main_v9.1/NB20201119/test_regression_20201119.log

All the differences occur in the MTD output files. It's also a good idea to update since computing diffs for different version numbers is much slower than computing diffs when the version numbers match.

  • Recommend testing for the reviewer to perform, including the location of input datasets:

    None.

  • Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [Yes]

    If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:

    Updating the reference version.

  • After merging, should the reviewer DELETE the feature branch from GitHub? [No]

    Do not delete the main_v9.1 branch.

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Complete the PR definition above.
  • Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
  • Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s), Project(s), and Milestone
  • After submitting the PR, select Linked Issues with the original issue number.

…entoried. This helps debugging issues with MET potentially not reading all input GRIB2 records on WCOSS.
* Per #1562, check for bad data values before adding data to the PDF's for grid_diag.

* Per #1562, removing the poly = CONUS.poly mask from GridDiagConfig_TMP. That settting masked a problem in the handling of missing data. Exercising the mask.poly option is tested in another unit test. This will change the output and break the nightly build, but that's good since we'll do more thorough testing.
…to print out some additional log messages that may help in debugging the intermittent file list failure.
* Per #1572, delete the docs/version file as it is not needed here.

* Per #1572, update the version number to 9.1.1.

* Per #1572, list the met-9.1.1 release date as 20201119 for the docs.

* Per #1572, add release notes for the met-9.1.1 verison.

* Per #1572, add release notes for met-9.1.1 version.

* Per #1572, let's try to release met-9.1.1 today 11/18.
@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway added this to the MET 9.1.1 (bugfix) milestone Nov 19, 2020
@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway linked an issue Nov 19, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
20 tasks
@JohnHalleyGotway
Copy link
Collaborator Author

As expected, the NB for main_v9.1 failed again for NB20201120. I checked again this morning that all of the diffs are confined to the MTD output files for which no diffing logic currently exists, and they are. Those diffs will go away once we update the reference version.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jprestop jprestop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes are clear and accepted.

@jprestop jprestop merged commit 2826feb into main_v9.1-ref Nov 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create the MET-9.1.1 bugfix release.
2 participants