-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update main_v9.1-ref after 1572 (v9.1.1 release) #1578
Conversation
…entoried. This helps debugging issues with MET potentially not reading all input GRIB2 records on WCOSS.
* Per #1562, check for bad data values before adding data to the PDF's for grid_diag. * Per #1562, removing the poly = CONUS.poly mask from GridDiagConfig_TMP. That settting masked a problem in the handling of missing data. Exercising the mask.poly option is tested in another unit test. This will change the output and break the nightly build, but that's good since we'll do more thorough testing.
…to print out some additional log messages that may help in debugging the intermittent file list failure.
* Per #1572, delete the docs/version file as it is not needed here. * Per #1572, update the version number to 9.1.1. * Per #1572, list the met-9.1.1 release date as 20201119 for the docs. * Per #1572, add release notes for the met-9.1.1 verison. * Per #1572, add release notes for met-9.1.1 version. * Per #1572, let's try to release met-9.1.1 today 11/18.
As expected, the NB for main_v9.1 failed again for NB20201120. I checked again this morning that all of the diffs are confined to the MTD output files for which no diffing logic currently exists, and they are. Those diffs will go away once we update the reference version. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes are clear and accepted.
Requesting to update the contents of main_v9.1-ref with the latest version of main_v9.1. The NB failed, as expected, after doing the v9.1.1 release. The test scripts do not know how to handle version differences in the output from MTD.
Pull Request Testing
I inspected the diffs flagged in:
kiowa:/d1/projects/MET/MET_regression/main_v9.1/NB20201119/test_regression_20201119.log
All the differences occur in the MTD output files. It's also a good idea to update since computing diffs for different version numbers is much slower than computing diffs when the version numbers match.
Recommend testing for the reviewer to perform, including the location of input datasets:
None.
Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [Yes]
If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
Updating the reference version.
After merging, should the reviewer DELETE the feature branch from GitHub? [No]
Do not delete the main_v9.1 branch.
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Select: Reviewer(s), Project(s), and Milestone