Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature 1996 sonarqube findings #2073

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsoh-u hsoh-u commented Feb 25, 2022

Expected Differences

No differences except SonarCube scanning result at MET_develop_NB

  • vx_config/threshold.cc: tf_left was used at the previous return statement

  • vx_util/ascii_table.cc: checks NULL pointer for "p"

  • vx_shapedata/interest.cc: reduced the duplicated for loops (SonarQube complains a potential memory access error)

  • vx_tc_util/genesis_info.h: "bool IsSet" is defined at the base class

  • Initialize variables at the other files

  • Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

  • Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

Pull Request Testing

Run unit test and check nothing is changed

  • Describe testing already performed for these changes:

  • Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:

  • Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [No]

  • Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [No]

  • Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [No]

    If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:

  • Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date].

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Review the source issue metadata (required labels, projects, and milestone).
  • Complete the PR definition above.
  • Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
  • Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s)
    Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
    Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
  • After submitting the PR, select Linked issues with the original issue number.
  • After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
  • Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

@hsoh-u hsoh-u added this to the MET 10.1.0 milestone Feb 25, 2022
@hsoh-u hsoh-u linked an issue Feb 25, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
22 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve of these changes.

Note that the GHA tests only failed with a difference due to a recently approved PR. I just merged the latest from develop into this feature branch which triggered the GHA tests to rerun. No differences should be flagged anymore.

I recommend waiting for that to happen (by 6:30pm on 2/28/22) prior to actually merging this PR.

@hsoh-u hsoh-u merged commit 7d63e0f into develop Mar 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Address findings from the SonarQube/Cppcheck code analysis tool
2 participants