Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix README references to header #190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2016
Merged

Conversation

jmm
Copy link
Contributor

@jmm jmm commented Aug 23, 2016

  • Token may not have been read from a header.
  • Token may have been read from header other than Authorization.

* Token may not have been read from a header.
* Token may have been read from header other than Authorization.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 100% (diff: 100%)

Merging #190 into master will not change coverage

@@           master   #190   diff @@
====================================
  Files           2      2          
  Lines          85     85          
  Methods         0      0          
  Messages        0      0          
  Branches        0      0          
====================================
  Hits           85     85          
  Misses          0      0          
  Partials        0      0          

Sunburst

Powered by Codecov. Last update 946b269...fd7c836

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ signature `function(decoded, callback)` where:
`validateFunc` which can be accessed via `request.plugins['hapi-auth-jwt2'].extraInfo`
- `validateFunc` - (***required***) the function which is run once the Token has been decoded with
signature `function(decoded, request, callback)` where:
- `decoded` - (***required***) is the ***decoded*** and ***verified*** JWT received from the client in **request.headers.authorization**
- `decoded` - (***required***) is the decoded and verified JWT received in the request
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer more detail than less here, but it should be self-explanatory... 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean the change in styling, or removal of the request.headers.authorization reference, or both, make for less detail?

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member

@jmm this is a great update. ❤️
Thank you for taking the time to fix these doc issues. 🎉

@nelsonic nelsonic merged commit d6e025b into dwyl:master Aug 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants