Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test #2295

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

test #2295

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

ttl33
Copy link
Contributor

@ttl33 ttl33 commented Sep 19, 2024

Changelist

[Describe or list the changes made in this PR]

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added comments clarifying the purpose of the NoOpMempool code for testing.
    • Included a note regarding a future task to transition to the original SDK's implementation.
  • Chores

    • Minor updates made for future planning without affecting existing functionality.

@ttl33 ttl33 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2024 13:19
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ttl33 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d6de86 and e9f4604.

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request involve adding comments in the noop.go file to clarify that the code is for testing purposes and includes a TODO note for future removal of the current NoOpMempool implementation. This implementation is a fork from the SDK, with plans to revert to the original SDK version. The functionality of noOpMempool remains unchanged, ensuring it still satisfies the mempool.Mempool interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
protocol/mempool/noop.go Added comments indicating the code is for testing and included a TODO to remove the current implementation in favor of the original SDK version. No changes to functionality.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix lint for affiliates #2255: This PR involves changes to error handling in test cases, which may relate to the testing context mentioned in the main PR's focus on documentation and future planning for the NoOpMempool implementation.
  • Fix broken vulcan tests #2268: This PR addresses issues with the vulcan tests, which could be relevant to the testing aspects discussed in the main PR, particularly since both involve improvements in test reliability and documentation.

Poem

In the meadow where bunnies hop,
A note was added, a future stop.
The NoOpMempool, a test for now,
Will soon return to the SDK's bow.
With every change, we leap with glee,
For code and rabbits, both roam free! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ttl33 ttl33 closed this Sep 19, 2024
@ttl33 ttl33 deleted the tl-test branch September 19, 2024 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant