Skip to content

alternative P256 approach with source inclusion #748

alternative P256 approach with source inclusion

alternative P256 approach with source inclusion #748

Triggered via pull request November 21, 2023 10:12
Status Success
Total duration 19m 13s
Artifacts

main.yml

on: pull_request
🚨 REUSE Compliance
40s
🚨 REUSE Compliance
🚨 C lint
21s
🚨 C lint
🚨 Lua lint
1m 37s
🚨 Lua lint
Matrix: 🐹 go build & checks
Matrix: 🐯 js build & checks
Matrix: 🥷 meson/ninja build
Matrix: 🦀 rust build & checks
🐧 Linux build
1m 15s
🐧 Linux build
🪟 Windows build
55s
🪟 Windows build
🍎 Macosx build
1m 11s
🍎 Macosx build
Matrix: 🐍 Python checks
🤖 Semantic release
0s
🤖 Semantic release
🐯 js build release
0s
🐯 js build release
🐧 Binary builds on Ubuntu
0s
🐧 Binary builds on Ubuntu
🍎 mac osx release build
0s
🍎 mac osx release build
🗃️ Check file changes
0s
🗃️ Check file changes
📦 npm release
0s
📦 npm release
📦 Pack release
0s
📦 Pack release
🧻 Remove tag on fail
0s
🧻 Remove tag on fail
🐍 Python create source distribution
0s
🐍 Python create source distribution
📦 PyPI release
0s
📦 PyPI release
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error and 4 warnings
🚨 Lua lint
Process completed with exit code 1.
[cpplint] src/p256-m.c#L1014: src/p256-m.c#L1014
Redundant blank line at the start of a code block should be deleted. [whitespace/blank_line] [2]
[cpplint] src/p256-m.c#L1218: src/p256-m.c#L1218
Missing space after ; [whitespace/semicolon] [3]
[cpplint] src/p256-m.h#L7: src/p256-m.h#L7
#ifndef header guard has wrong style, please use: SRC_P256_M_H_ [build/header_guard] [5]
[cpplint] src/p256-m.h#L99: src/p256-m.h#L99
#endif line should be "#endif // SRC_P256_M_H_" [build/header_guard] [5]