-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix total_unread_ consistent with reader's history after get_first_untaken_info #3223
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…taken_info (#3203) * Refs 16608: Added BlackBoxTest Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com> * Refs 16608: Fix. Make get_first_untaken_info() a read-only API call Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com> * Refs #16608: Fix tsan warning Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com> * Refs #16608: Applied suggested changes Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com> * Refs #16608: Applied second-reviewed suggested changes Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com> * Refs #16608: Skip test for Data-Sharing Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
Mario-DL
previously approved these changes
Jan 18, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Mario-DL
reviewed
Jan 18, 2023
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
Mario-DL
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
@fujitatomoya Would you mind running a ROS2 CI with this one? |
MiguelCompany
added
ready-to-merge
Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved.
and removed
ci-pending
PR which CI is running
labels
Jan 18, 2023
fujitatomoya
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is a rework of #3203 that avoids the segfault reported on ros2/rmw_fastrtps#659
Backports: We will update the currently created PRs (#3217, #3218, #3219) accordingly
Contributor Checklist
versions.md
file (if applicable).Reviewer Checklist