Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for Amber (amber.py) #3094

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

branfosj
Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Jan 28, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

  • EB_Amber used in AmberTools
  • No use of EB_Amber in blocks

@branfosj branfosj added this to the 5.0 milestone Jan 28, 2024
@branfosj branfosj changed the title replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in amber.py replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in amber.py Jan 28, 2024
@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS Amber-22.0-foss-2021b-AmberTools-22.3-CUDA-11.4.1.eb
  • SUCCESS Amber-22.4-foss-2022a-AmberTools-22.5-CUDA-11.7.0.eb

Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0103u01a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6330 CPU @ 2.00GHz (icelake), 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 520.61.05, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/2c6059014b58a489cdb86dfb2384ecb9 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj changed the title replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in amber.py replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for ADF (amber.py) Jan 29, 2024
@branfosj branfosj changed the title replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for ADF (amber.py) replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for Amber (amber.py) Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel merged commit 6bd2886 into easybuilders:5.0.x Jan 29, 2024
17 checks passed
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240128141342_new_pr_amber branch January 29, 2024 11:05
@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS Amber-22.0-foss-2021b-AmberTools-22.3.eb
  • SUCCESS AmberTools-21-intel-2021b.eb
  • SUCCESS netCDF-Fortran-4.5.3-gompi-2020b.eb
  • SUCCESS PnetCDF-1.12.2-gompi-2020b.eb
  • SUCCESS Amber-20.11-foss-2020b-AmberTools-21.3.eb

Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/0962ad06e74e4f63a89b0157da3f72f8 for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants