{numlib}[GCC/9.3.0] AMD-LibM v3.6.0-4, AMD-RNG v2.2, AMD-SecureRNG v2.2 #11929
Conversation
…3.0.eb, AMD-SecureRNG-2.2-GCC-9.3.0.eb
|
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
Test report by @migueldiascosta |
|
@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 750629714 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Going in, thanks @SebastianAchilles! |
| toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '9.3.0'} | ||
|
|
||
| source_urls = ['http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/files/'] | ||
| sources = ['aocl-rng-linux-gcc-%(version)s-4.tar.gz'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@SebastianAchilles Shouldn't the -4 be part of the version?
| toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '9.3.0'} | ||
|
|
||
| source_urls = ['http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/files/'] | ||
| sources = ['aocl-securerng-linux-gcc-%(version)s-4.tar.gz'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here, shouldn't -4 be part of the version (like it is for AMD-LibM)?
|
|
||
| sanity_check_paths = { | ||
| 'files': [], | ||
| 'dirs': ['lib'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could be a bit more specific, a sanity check like this isn't very useful imho :)
(created using
eb --new-pr)