Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[foss/2021a] GROMACS v2021.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 + CUDA 11.3.1 + PLUMED v2.7.2 #14409

Merged

Conversation

smoors
Copy link
Contributor

@smoors smoors commented Nov 23, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)

depends on easyblock PR

…2.eb and patches: GROMACS-2021.3_skip_test_for_plumed.patch
@smoors smoors added the update label Nov 23, 2021
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor Author

smoors commented Nov 23, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2621"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14409 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2621" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14409 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 7314

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 976798890 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor Author

smoors commented Nov 23, 2021

Test report by @smoors
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2621
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node400.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor (zen2), 2 x NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 460.73.01, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/5a972259194b0a442397eda31ceff576 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2621
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0c0701d29241972ea817237f80eb71cf for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Nov 25, 2021
@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[foss/2021a] GROMACS v2021.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 {bio}[foss/2021a] GROMACS v2021.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 + CUDA 11.3.1 Nov 25, 2021
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Nov 25, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 25, 2021

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2621
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3152.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/c86a297609912711f95eea4e8bc20c23 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 25, 2021

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2621
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3302.joltik.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6242 CPU @ 2.80GHz (cascadelake), 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 465.19.01, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d09896962dafaff4d0f943eb047c246a for a full test report.

@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[foss/2021a] GROMACS v2021.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 + CUDA 11.3.1 {bio}[foss/2021a] GROMACS v2021.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 + CUDA 11.3.1 + PLUMED v2.7.2 Nov 26, 2021
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.5.1?) Nov 26, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 26, 2021

Going in, thanks @smoors!

@boegel boegel merged commit d46a899 into easybuilders:develop Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants