Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add additional valid checksum for optmatch 0.9-15 in extension in R 4.1.2 #14993

Merged

Conversation

akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

@akesandgren akesandgren commented Feb 14, 2022

(created using eb --new-pr)

Change is only in the DESCRIPTION file.

Copy link
Member

@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16
EB_ARGS="--parallel-extensions-install --experimental --force-download --sourcepath /tmp/$USER/pr14993"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14993 EB_ARGS="--parallel-extensions-install --experimental --force-download --sourcepath /tmp/$USER/pr14993" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14993 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8137

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1039965807 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cnx3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/09bf1917b1face3374c055e9cce2a52a for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @akesandgren!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants