Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{chem}[foss/2022a] CP2K v9.1, v2022.1 #16007

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 20, 2023

Conversation

alinelena
Copy link
Contributor

@alinelena alinelena commented Aug 9, 2022

some tests are failing, see the comments in #15146

@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles added this to the 4.x milestone Aug 9, 2022
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16007 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16007 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8967

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1209367040 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegel
boegel previously requested changes Aug 27, 2022
easybuild/easyconfigs/c/CP2K/CP2K-2022.1-foss-2022a.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maxim-masterov
Copy link
Collaborator

Can this PR be updated?

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Apr 17, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16007 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16007 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10665

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1510886560 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/b5ccbf2c5bd1bdaf598f8400c1753780 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Apr 17, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=16007 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_16007 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2532

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1512068924 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/088ebb3257de3bfa808fb968c36ac567 for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@lexming lexming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lexming lexming modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.7.2) Apr 20, 2023
@lexming lexming dismissed boegel’s stale review April 20, 2023 08:49

review comments addressed

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Apr 20, 2023

Thanks @alinelena , going in!

@lexming lexming merged commit 40ae12b into easybuilders:develop Apr 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants