Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

skip NASA performance test in netCDF v4.9.0 #16050

Merged

Conversation

Micket
Copy link
Contributor

@Micket Micket commented Aug 17, 2022

fixes #15959
(hopefully!)

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor Author

Micket commented Aug 17, 2022

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-c1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/1abd25bd95c3d2149ac484d647d21de9 for a full test report.

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor Author

Micket commented Aug 17, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@Micket Micket added the change label Aug 17, 2022
@Micket Micket added this to the next release (4.6.1?) milestone Aug 17, 2022
@Micket Micket added bug fix and removed change labels Aug 17, 2022
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16050 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16050 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9020

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1217781614 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16050 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16050 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9021

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1217997690 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f88308457e79cb00bcda271cc3142f1a for a full test report.

@Ghepardo
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @Ghepardo
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
rothhpc4-ezy.cluster.local - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/3ea20c35b5affd939ba49fe7d96c9ba0 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/282d7fca5b63ddee996bb7abbea90c38 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @Micket!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit 2b115b7 into easybuilders:develop Aug 17, 2022
@Micket Micket deleted the 20220817112801_new_pr_netCDF490 branch August 17, 2022 16:13
@boegel boegel changed the title Skip NASA performance test in netCDF skip NASA performance test in netCDF v4.9.0 Aug 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test timeouts for netCDF 4.9.0
4 participants