Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{devel,lib}[GCCcore/12.2.0] Doxygen v1.9.5, libiconv v1.17 #16825

Merged

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Dec 8, 2022

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added the update label Dec 8, 2022
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.7.0) milestone Dec 8, 2022
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 8, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16825 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16825 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9712

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1342400893 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 8, 2022

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node3104.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0a3fe6d99067b6b9e6ff73112d1b589a for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/a540a4638b71f5a8536aaef30c3ec119 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 8, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=16825 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_16825 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 1851

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1343151781 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2g1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/47af602e743e499525ba2e774ad0a433 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 8, 2022

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u36b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e43dabd4f53bf9b49272529f47be653f for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 8, 2022

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u08b.bear.cluster - Linux Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.8.5
See https://gist.github.com/da4edd9a426c8880a33ec1b061b08b3c for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Dec 8, 2022

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit 361b013 into easybuilders:develop Dec 8, 2022
@boegel boegel deleted the 20221208102806_new_pr_Doxygen195 branch December 12, 2022 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants