-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{toolchain}[dummy/dummy] goblf v2019a (REVIEW) #8300
{toolchain}[dummy/dummy] goblf v2019a (REVIEW) #8300
Conversation
…PL-2.3-goblf-2019a.eb, LAPACK-3.8.0-gompi-2019a.eb, ScaLAPACK-2.0.2-gompi-2019a-BLIS-0.5.2.eb
Travis test report: 2/2 runs failed - see https://travis-ci.org/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/builds/531574602 Only showing partial log for 1st failed test suite run 15002.2;
*bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20180813.01)*Please talk to my owner @boegel if you notice you me acting stupid),or submit a pull request to https://github.com/boegel/boegelbot fix the problem. |
Test report by @migueldiascosta |
simultaneous linear equations, least-squares solutions of linear systems of equations, eigenvalue | ||
problems, and singular value problems.""" | ||
|
||
toolchain = {'name': 'gompi', 'version': '2019a'} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm... I updated an existing easyconfig but I don't see why LAPACK
should be at gompi
instead of GCC
level...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed @migueldiascosta please look at #6615.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm, now that you mention that PR, I recall having seen it before, should have looked for it...
Test report by @migueldiascosta |
we have the same issue as in #6615 in the test suite... we'll need to fix that too. The code is fairly complex. |
updating on my initial comments, I now also have a I also have an I'm saying this here because I'd like to know if I'm missing something and what, if anything, people think is worth contributing and in which variants, I'll open separate PRs if there is any interest. |
Travis test report: 2/2 runs failed - see https://travis-ci.org/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/builds/532285596 Only showing partial log for 1st failed test suite run 15070.1;
*bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20180813.01)*Please talk to my owner @boegel if you notice you me acting stupid),or submit a pull request to https://github.com/boegel/boegelbot fix the problem. |
superseded by #11761 |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)couldn't find existing easyconfigs for the
goblf
toolchain created by @bartoldeman, this seems to follow the definition (?). In particular, the definition usesLAPACK
, I wanted to try usinglibFLAME
, can I change this toolchain definition or shall I define a newgobff
(?) toolchain?There also exists already a
linalg/flame
definition created by @stdweird which doesn't seem to be used anythere (?), can I change it to use thelibFLAME
easyconfigs or shall I define a newlinalg/libflame
?