Rename bluechi RPM to bluechi-controller

[mwperina]

Renames bluechi RPM to bluechi-controller, which better describes the
content of the package.

Signed-off-by: Martin Perina mperina@redhat.com

[pypingou]

+1 on the rename to -controller but I'm not sure on the meta package

[engelmi]

+1 on the rename to -controller but I'm not sure on the meta package

Isn't the meta package just for simplification and logically group packages? E.g. typing one command installs all packages? In that case it would be ok since its still possible to install each package individually, right?

[rhatdan]

Wouldn't the metapackage be just bluechi,

yum install bluechi

Installs all packages?

[mwperina]

Wouldn't the metapackage be just bluechi,

yum install bluechi

Installs all packages?

Sorry, I forgot to update PR description according to latest changes in the commit.
Pierre raised the upgrade issue I've missed:

for one this is going to break upgrades where suddenly where you had bluechi you'll end up with the 3 sub-packages
and also, that simplicity "hides" a bit the fact that there are three parts

So by having bluechi-all we can solve the hiding problem and by bluechi-controller obsoleting bluechi we can solve the upgrade issue

[engelmi]

LGTM

[rhatdan]

@pypingou Is this a common pattern for fedora, to install all packages like this? Other examples?

[pypingou]

@pypingou Is this a common pattern for fedora, to install all packages like this? Other examples?

No I think the only approaching thing I've seen is the used of groups in comps.xml and then dnf install @group, but I don't know a single meta-package package like this.
Maybe @contyk would have one?

[contyk]

Why of course, there are modules! /j

Indeed, things like this are usually implemented as package groups + [weak] dependencies. However, I do remember one similar package: zathura-plugins-all.

[mwperina]

OK, removed metapackage

[rhatdan]

LGTM