Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#432#257 Align server action with client protocol #142

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2021

Conversation

tortmayr
Copy link
Contributor

@tortmayr tortmayr commented Nov 9, 2021

  • Ensure that all request/response actions are implemented as proper request-response action pair
  • Ensure that getter for optional action properties returns an Optional
  • Ensure that action properties that have a collection type are always initialized
  • Rename static action kind constant to KIND

Closes eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/432
Part of eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/257

- Ensure that all request/response actions are implemented as proper request-response action pair
- Ensure that getter for optional action properties returns an Optional
- Ensure that action properties that have a collection type are always initialized
- Rename static action kind constant to `KIND`
- Update to latest emfcloud-checkstyle config
- Remove model state argument from GModelFactory & NavigationTargetResolver (#458)

Closes eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/458
Closes eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/432
Part of eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/257
@tortmayr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tortmayr commented Dec 6, 2021

@martin-fleck-at I already included the Metadata changes for the upcoming release in this commit (versions, md updates, changelogs etc.). Please review them as well. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@martin-fleck-at martin-fleck-at left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me and everything still works as expected. Thank you for the great work, Tobias! I just have a few minor comments for the new change log, so maybe you can have a look at that but they should not prevent merging and may also be done in a follow-up PR.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- Update versions to 0.9.0
- Update Metadata
   -Add changelog.md
   - Update LICENSE.md
   - Update Contributing.md (Remove mentions of spectrum and forum)
   - Update Secutiry.md
@tortmayr tortmayr force-pushed the tortmayr/issues/432 branch from ec182aa to c9a520b Compare December 8, 2021 13:36
@tortmayr tortmayr merged commit fac40ff into master Dec 8, 2021
@tortmayr tortmayr deleted the tortmayr/issues/432 branch December 8, 2021 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Align Server response action with client protocol
2 participants