Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial DevContainer setup #128

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

mikehaller
Copy link
Contributor

A DevContainer which shows how to set up the Rust compiler and tools to make the databroker build work in vscode out of the box.

I know devcontainers are subjective and some project members may not be in favour of such a "proprietary" setup. But it will help the adoption for developers in a corporate environment :-P

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.14%. Comparing base (bd6290a) to head (42c0cd6).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #128      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.11%   60.14%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines       16191    16191              
==========================================
+ Hits         9733     9738       +5     
+ Misses       6458     6453       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SebastianSchildt
Copy link
Contributor

@mikehaller Attention if you keep working on this locally, I did a rebase, becasue I assume the linter errors might have been due to recently merged #129

@SebastianSchildt
Copy link
Contributor

Looking good to me, just not sure we should pdate Cargo.lock in here (this PR has changed nothing in Cargo, but changing it here, might be some rebasing trouble for the next PR actually needs to change it, like probably #119 ). Opinion @lukasmittag ?

Copy link
Contributor

@SebastianSchildt SebastianSchildt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, shouldn't break any existing functionality. If CI agrees let's merge 🍏

Copy link
Contributor

@lukasmittag lukasmittag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@lukasmittag lukasmittag merged commit 6459879 into eclipse-kuksa:main Feb 3, 2025
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants