Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zenoh 1.0.0 release #116

Open
Mallets opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 Discussed in #115 · 3 comments
Open

Zenoh 1.0.0 release #116

Mallets opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 Discussed in #115 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
release Part of the next release

Comments

@Mallets
Copy link
Member

Mallets commented Jan 24, 2024

Target date: April 22nd, 2024.

A dedicated project has been created to track all the PRs and issues that will land in the release.
The high-level set of features is the following:

API polishing

  • Review the API and verify the API follows Zenoh's API principles
  • Polish-out some rough edges on the API

API alignment

  • Provide a coverage matrix for the API and all supported languages
  • Make sure the API is aligned across all language bindings

Shared Memory

  • Provide Shared Memory support in any topology and not-only in clique
  • New API for plugging different types of SHM backends

Protocol improvement

  • Review of the protocol
  • Improvement of declarations propagation

Tokio porting

  • Move Zenoh's async runtime to Tokio
  • Provide additional control on threads

CI/CD improvement

  • Improve cross-repo integration
  • Streamline release process

Eclipse Review

@Mallets Mallets moved this to Q2 2024 - Apr-Jun in Zenoh Roadmap Jan 24, 2024
@Mallets Mallets moved this to In progress in Zenoh 1.0.0 release Jan 24, 2024
@Mallets Mallets self-assigned this Jan 24, 2024
@sanri
Copy link

sanri commented Jan 25, 2024

Is it intended to support both async-std and tokio?

@Mallets
Copy link
Member Author

Mallets commented Jan 25, 2024

Zenoh internal async runtime is migrating to Tokio. If an application wants to use async-std, it can still doing via async-std's compatibility features. For any additional discussion about this topic, I suggest to move here and not on the roadmap issue.

@sebbyjp
Copy link

sebbyjp commented Aug 20, 2024

Shared memory implemented with python bindings?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release Part of the next release
Projects
Status: In progress
Status: Q2 2024 - Apr-Jun
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants