Remove redux from example package

[TheZoker]

Current status:

Example	Working	Broken before	Comment
1169	✅
1220	✅		No action buttons (and logic)
1273	✅
1713	✅
allOf	✅
anyOf	✅
anyOf_simple	✅
oneOf	✅
1265_array	✅	✅
1265_object	✅
1265_simple	✅
1273_simple	✅
oneOfArray	✅
anyOf-oneOf-allOf-resolve	✅	✅
array	✅		No action buttons (and logic)
nestedArray	✅	✅	No action buttons (and logic)
person	✅
array-with-detail	✅
array-with-detail-and-rule	✅
array-with-custom-element-label	✅
stringArray	✅
categorization	✅
categorizationstepper	✅
categorizationsteppernavbuttons	✅
control-options	✅
day1	✅
day2	✅
day3	✅
day4	✅
day5	✅
day6	❌	✅	Lot of code, for small feature
dates	✅
dynamic	✅
generate	✅
generate-ui	✅
layout-vertical	✅
layout-horizontal	✅
layout-group	✅
layout-complex	✅
rule	✅
rule-enable	✅		No action buttons (and logic)
resolve	❌		Removed in #1829
configDefault	✅
configCustom	✅
text	✅
numbers	✅
scope	✅
list-with-detail	✅	✅
list-with-detail-no-labelref	✅	✅
list-with-detail-registered	✅	✅
rootObject	✅
object	✅
i18n	❌		Lot of code, for small feature
issue-1253	✅
issue-1253-wrong-path-binding	✅
issue-1253-cell-missing-cell	✅	✅
issue-1253-add-button-empty-row	✅	✅
issue-1253-enum-error	✅	✅
issue-1254	✅
oneOf-recursive	✅
huge	✅	✅
default	✅
onChange	✅
enum	✅		No action buttons (and logic)
radio-group	✅
booleanToggle	✅
multi-enum	✅
enumInArray	✅
Readonly Fields	✅
1779-string	❌	✅	No applicable renderer found (ListWithDetails works for objects, but not for strings/numbers)
1779-number	❌	✅	No applicable renderer found (ListWithDetails works for objects, but not for strings/numbers)
ifthenelse	✅

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 85.447% when pulling 27f2650 on TheZoker:remove-redux-example into d5a9038 on eclipsesource:master.

[LukasBoll]

Overall Code looks good and the examples themselves are behaving well, but there are some problems when changing between examples, e.g.:
Changing from “oneOf (in Array)” to “array”: No appliciable renderer is found.
Changing from “Date” to ”DynamicChange”: The old Schema from Date is used.

[TheZoker]

Thanks for the review! Yes you are right, there seems to be an issue when switching examples. I'll have to investigate this further

[LukasBoll]

Looks good to me, thank you!

[sdirix]

LGTM! Thanks!