Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Create UCR for using URIs to load files #938

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 25, 2023

Conversation

lenny-goodell
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Leonard Goodell leonard.goodell@intel.com

If your build fails due to your commit message not passing the build checks, please review the guidelines here: https://github.com/edgexfoundry/edgex-docs/blob/main/.github/Contributing.md

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Changes have been rendered and validated locally using mkdocs-material (see edgex-docs README)

Signed-off-by: Leonard Goodell <leonard.goodell@intel.com>
bnevis-i
bnevis-i previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2023
docs_src/design/ucr/URIs-for-Files.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ejlee3
ejlee3 previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@ejlee3 ejlee3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Signed-off-by: Leonard Goodell <leonard.goodell@intel.com>
@lenny-goodell lenny-goodell dismissed stale reviews from ejlee3 and bnevis-i via 5aeea9a January 18, 2023 21:07
bnevis-i
bnevis-i previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2023
farshidtz
farshidtz previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2023
Copy link
Member

@farshidtz farshidtz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I do have some minor comments but no strong opinion against the UCR.

docs_src/design/ucr/URIs-for-Files.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs_src/design/ucr/URIs-for-Files.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Leonard Goodell <leonard.goodell@intel.com>
@lenny-goodell lenny-goodell dismissed stale reviews from farshidtz and bnevis-i via f91ae13 January 19, 2023 16:08
farshidtz
farshidtz previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2023
bnevis-i
bnevis-i previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2023
Signed-off-by: Leonard Goodell <leonard.goodell@intel.com>
@lenny-goodell lenny-goodell dismissed stale reviews from bnevis-i and farshidtz via f0005c6 January 25, 2023 17:47
Copy link
Member

@farshidtz farshidtz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this mechanism is a quick workaround which simplifies the distribution of static configurations across multiple deployments of the EdgeX stack.

Nevertheless, I believe that such functionality should be generally handed off to the Config Provider, or rather, a federation of Config Providers. This is not easily possible right now because device configurations are maintained in Core Metadata.

This UCR does make strong assumptions about how a functionality should be realized, rather than just laying out the use case and application requirements.

@lenny-goodell lenny-goodell merged commit 1477c0d into edgexfoundry:main Jan 25, 2023
@lenny-goodell lenny-goodell deleted the uris-for-files branch January 25, 2023 20:04
edgex-jenkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2023
Signed-off-by: edgex-jenkins <collab-it+edgex@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants