Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use an automation branch #45

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 21, 2024
Merged

Use an automation branch #45

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

edwardtfn
Copy link
Owner

@edwardtfn edwardtfn commented Dec 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced versioning process with the introduction of temporary branches for version bumps.
    • New documentation section detailing the versioning workflow and automation benefits.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved commit message format to prevent workflow re-triggering.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to clarify versioning automation, benefits, and system details.
  • Chores

    • Version number simplified from 2024.12.01 to 2024.12.1.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request enhances the versioning and tagging workflow by implementing a temporary branch strategy for version updates. Key changes include renaming the workflow, adding conditions to ignore certain file changes, and introducing a new step to create a temporary branch. The merging process has been modified to include checking out the main branch and merging the temporary branch with a specific commit message. Additionally, the README documentation has been significantly restructured to provide clearer guidance on the versioning process, and the version number format has been simplified.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/versioning.yml - Renamed workflow to "Version Bump and Tag"
- Added condition to ignore changes in **/VERSION and **/VERSION_YAML
- Introduced new step to create a temporary branch
- Renamed step to push changes to temporary branch
- Added step to merge changes into main branch
- Added step to delete temporary branch
versioning/README.md - Restructured documentation
- Added "How It Works" section
- Expanded explanations in "Automated Workflow" and "Benefits" sections
- Introduced new "System Details" and "GitHub Workflow" sections
versioning/VERSION - Updated version from 2024.12.01 to 2024.12.1
versioning/bump_version.sh - Modified commit message format to include [skip-versioning]

Possibly related PRs

  • New versioning #39: Relates to the versioning workflow automation introduced in this pull request, sharing similar goals of streamlining version management processes.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f4fc7a and 2d79ee4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/versioning.yml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/versioning.yml

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
versioning/README.md (2)

24-24: Improve active voice usage

Consider rephrasing to use active voice for better clarity.

Suggested change:

- No manual intervention is needed for versioning.
+ The automated workflow handles all versioning tasks.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~24-~24: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym like ‘required’ here. Or, to avoid using the passive voice, try replacing the past participle ‘needed’ with an adjective.
Context: ...nto main. - No manual intervention is needed for versioning. ### Accessing the Vers...

(IS_NEEDED_NECESSARY)


48-48: Fix punctuation in list item

Remove the loose period for consistency with other list items.

Suggested change:

- `sequential_number`: A positive number incremented with each release in the same month.
+ `sequential_number`: A positive number incremented with each release in the same month
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~48-~48: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...no leading zeros). - sequential_number: A positive number incremented with each...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c98d81 and 4e73a11.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/versioning.yml (2 hunks)
  • versioning/README.md (1 hunks)
  • versioning/VERSION (1 hunks)
  • versioning/bump_version.sh (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • versioning/VERSION
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
versioning/README.md

[style] ~24-~24: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym like ‘required’ here. Or, to avoid using the passive voice, try replacing the past participle ‘needed’ with an adjective.
Context: ...nto main. - No manual intervention is needed for versioning. ### Accessing the Vers...

(IS_NEEDED_NECESSARY)


[uncategorized] ~48-~48: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...no leading zeros). - sequential_number: A positive number incremented with each...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml

9-9: unexpected key "commit-message" for "push" section. expected one of "branches", "branches-ignore", "paths", "paths-ignore", "tags", "tags-ignore", "types", "workflows"

(syntax-check)


31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


44-44: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
versioning/bump_version.sh (1)

45-45: LGTM: Skip marker addition prevents workflow loops

The addition of [skip-versioning] to the commit message is a good practice to prevent the version bump workflow from re-triggering.

Let's verify the commit message handling:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM: Skip marker is properly implemented in both script and workflow

The verification confirms that the [skip-versioning] marker is correctly implemented:

  • The workflow configuration explicitly excludes commits with [skip-versioning] marker in the on.push.commit-message.excludes setting
  • The workflow itself adds the skip marker in its merge commit message
  • The bump_version.sh script adds the skip marker in its commit message

This creates a complete loop prevention system where version bump commits won't trigger additional version bumps.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify commit message handling in version bumps
# Check recent version bump commits to ensure they include the skip marker

git log --oneline | grep -E "Bump version to [0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ \[skip-versioning\]"

Length of output: 0


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the workflow configuration to ensure it properly handles the skip marker

# Check workflow files for version bump skip conditions
rg -l "skip-versioning" .github/workflows/

# Check the specific workflow content
fd "version.*ya?ml" .github/workflows/ -x cat {}

Length of output: 2010

versioning/README.md (1)

11-16: LGTM: Clear workflow documentation

The "How It Works" section provides a clear and concise explanation of the new temporary branch strategy.

.github/workflows/versioning.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/versioning.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/versioning.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/versioning.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/versioning.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml (2)

54-54: Consider the implications of --no-ff merge strategy

Using --no-ff creates a merge commit even when a fast-forward merge is possible. While this provides explicit tracking of version bumps, it might lead to a more complex git history. Consider if this aligns with your team's branching strategy.


Line range hint 1-62: Well-architected version management workflow

The workflow demonstrates good practices:

  • Uses temporary branches for isolation
  • Includes proper cleanup with if: always()
  • Prevents infinite loops with [skip-versioning] in commit messages
  • Properly excludes version files from triggering the workflow

Consider adding error handling for the version bump script execution and documenting the workflow's behavior in the repository's documentation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

32-32: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


45-45: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


61-61: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


61-61: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e73a11 and a23a2db.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/versioning.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml

32-32: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


45-45: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


61-61: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


61-61: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml (6)

1-1: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration.

The changes improve the workflow by:

  • Adding clear documentation
  • Using a more descriptive workflow name
  • Properly configuring path exclusions to prevent unnecessary runs

Also applies to: 3-3, 9-11


31-35: Quote variables in temporary branch creation

The branch name creation is good, but the variable should be quoted to prevent word splitting.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

32-32: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


42-47: Quote GitHub token in push command

The GitHub token should be quoted to prevent potential issues with special characters.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

45-45: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


48-55: Quote variables in merge steps

Variables in git commands should be quoted for safety.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


57-62: Quote variables in cleanup step

The cleanup step should also use quoted variables.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

61-61: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


61-61: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


58-58: LGTM! Good use of if: always()

Using if: always() ensures the temporary branch is cleaned up even if previous steps fail, which is a good practice for maintaining repository cleanliness.

edwardtfn and others added 2 commits December 21, 2024 13:54
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-61: Consider additional error handling and logging.

While the workflow design is solid, consider these improvements for better robustness:

  1. Add error handling for the case where the temporary branch already exists
  2. Add more detailed logging of each step's success/failure
  3. Consider adding a timeout for the merge step to prevent hanging workflows

Would you like assistance implementing these improvements?

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a23a2db and 3f4fc7a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/versioning.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml

50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/versioning.yml (4)

1-11: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration.

The workflow configuration is properly set up with:

  • Clear description of the workflow's purpose
  • Appropriate trigger conditions
  • Path exclusions to prevent recursive triggers from version file updates

31-35: LGTM! Robust temporary branch creation.

The implementation uses best practices:

  • Unique branch naming using UUID
  • Proper variable quoting
  • Correct environment variable handling

47-54: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix security vulnerability: Quote variables in merge steps.

There are potential security vulnerabilities due to unquoted variables that could lead to command injection.

Apply these changes:

-          git pull https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git main
-          git merge --no-ff $TEMP_BRANCH -m "Automated Version Bump [skip-versioning]"
-          git push https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git main
+          git pull "https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git" main
+          git merge --no-ff "${TEMP_BRANCH}" -m "Automated Version Bump [skip-versioning]"
+          git push "https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git" main

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:19: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


56-61: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix security vulnerability: Quote variables in cleanup step.

There are potential security vulnerabilities due to unquoted variables that could lead to command injection.

Apply this change:

-          git push https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git --delete $TEMP_BRANCH
+          git push "https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git" --delete "${TEMP_BRANCH}"

Good practice using always() to ensure cleanup runs regardless of previous step outcomes.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:98: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

.github/workflows/versioning.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@edwardtfn edwardtfn merged commit d04c2af into main Dec 21, 2024
8 checks passed
This was referenced Dec 21, 2024
@edwardtfn edwardtfn deleted the new-versioning-02 branch December 21, 2024 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant