Changed "pfet_pass" to "pfet_latch" everywhere. #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
since the SRAM cells do not use pFETs as pass transistors and the device in question is the complement of "nfet_latch" and should be called "pfet_latch". This name change has been made throughout the repository, leaving only a subcircuit definition for "pfet_pass" that instantiates "pfet_latch", for backwards compatibility with legacy netlists.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Corrected the long-time problem with the erroneous name "pfet_pass", since the SRAM cells do not use pFETs as pass transistors and the device in question is the complement of "nfet_latch" and should be called "pfet_latch". This name change has been made throughout the repository, leaving only a subcircuit definition for "pfet_pass" that instantiates "pfet_latch", for backwards compatibility with legacy netlists.