fix: export types like ResourcesController #11
Conversation
WalkthroughThis change updates the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.40% 99.40%
=======================================
Files 4 4
Lines 1679 1681 +2
Branches 216 216
=======================================
+ Hits 1669 1671 +2
Misses 10 10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/index.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/index.ts (3)
3-3: The export of all types from./types.jslooks correct and should help in managing type imports more efficiently.
4-4: Exporting all entities from./Layer.jsis consistent with typical TypeScript module patterns.
4-4: Ensure that all necessary entities are exported from./Layer.jsand that no private or internal components are unintentionally exposed.Verification successful
The script results show that
src/Layer.tscontains the following export statements:
export interface LayerOptionsexport interface LayerURLOptionsexport class LayerThese exports appear to be intentional and do not include any private or internal components that should not be exposed.
src/Layer.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no internal components are being exported from `./Layer.js`. # Test: Search for private entities that should not be exported. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export $$$'Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no internal components are being exported from `./Layer.js`. # Test: Search for all exported entities in `./Layer.js`. fd Layer.js --exec ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export {$$$}' --json fd Layer.js --exec ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export * from "$$_"' --json fd Layer.js --exec ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default $$_' --jsonLength of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no internal components are being exported from `./Layer.js`. # Check if `Layer.js` exists and list its contents. fd Layer.js # Search for all export statements in `Layer.js`. rg 'export ' Layer.jsLength of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no internal components are being exported from `Layer.js`. # Locate the `Layer.js` file in the repository. fd -t f -e js -e ts Layer # Search for all export statements in the located `Layer.js` file. fd -t f -e js -e ts Layer --exec rg 'export ' {}Length of output: 200
[skip ci] ## [3.0.1](v3.0.0...v3.0.1) (2024-06-15) ### Bug Fixes * export types like ResourcesController ([#11](#11)) ([83d3309](83d3309))
Summary by CodeRabbit
types.jsand added exports forLayer.js, providing better integration and usability for developers.