Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Special-case the initial progress report #642

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2020

Conversation

JulianKniephoff
Copy link
Member

Previously, the case of no preexisting progress history was handled
somewhat implicitly, which is at least error prone, and in this case
actually lead to a bug.

This patch handles that case explicitly, and simplifies the generic
case at the same time.


This fixes Sentry issue 86.

Previously, the case of no preexisting progress history was handled
somewhat implicitly, which is at least error prone, and in this case
actually lead to a bug.

This patch handles that case explicitly, and simplifies the generic
case at the same time.
@LukasKalbertodt
Copy link
Member

Travis status reporting failed somehow. CI is green.

@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt merged commit bdf252d into elan-ev:master Jun 10, 2020
@JulianKniephoff JulianKniephoff deleted the fix-sentry-issue-86 branch November 27, 2023 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants