-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New hashing algorithm for fingerprint processor #15418
Conversation
Since this is a community submitted pull request, a Jenkins build has not been kicked off automatically. Can an Elastic organization member please verify the contents of this patch and then kick off a build manually? |
1 similar comment
Since this is a community submitted pull request, a Jenkins build has not been kicked off automatically. Can an Elastic organization member please verify the contents of this patch and then kick off a build manually? |
Ready to be reviewed @ycombinator |
CI fails like so:
This is because we need to vendor the |
jenkins, test this |
Could you also add a line about this enhancement in the |
@ycombinator Do you have vendoring process automated with any make/mage task or should I copy manually the dependency ? I was looking for some task but without success |
We use |
Ok all sugestions were solved |
@rvillablanca Left a couple of minor suggestions but this is looking good otherwise! |
BTW, looks like CI is now failing on an outdated |
I will check |
Also, could you add the new hash method ( |
* Using a new constructor function xxhash.NewHash64
jenkins, test this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks for the contribution @rvillablanca and for working through the issue with the hash.Hash
interface. I'll merge this once CI looks good.
I think we are done with all @ycombinator, any questions do not hesitate to ask me |
|
Ok |
jenkins, test this |
Travis CI is green. Jenkins CI failures are unrelated. Merging. |
* XXHash configuration and test * Removed unused option * Inlining function * Changelog documentation * xxhash library vendored * Updated changelog * Update NOTICE.txt * * Update version github.com/OneOfOne/xxhash@1.2.7 * Using a new constructor function xxhash.NewHash64 * Add xxhash as option for hashing algorithm in fingerprint's docs * Update NOTICE.txt Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Villablanca Vásquez <villa061004@gmail.com>
This adds a the xxHash hashing to the list of available methods in the fingerprint processor.
Solves #15080