-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[packaging][beats-tester] use commit id binaries #22027
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7f212d3
[packaging][beats-tester] use commit id binaries
v1v cad5685
[packaging] use commit version
v1v 34d2067
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feature/beats-tes…
v1v 9aa0feb
Fix missing parenthesis
v1v 5f6f7db
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feature/beats-tes…
v1v 2d00db5
Fix post within a node
v1v 4145032
Fix missing argument and fallback to default checkout
v1v ea2f814
Support version
v1v 43b878d
Set env variable in the linting stage which already got the mage setup
v1v 1605aef
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feature/beats-tes…
v1v 87816f4
Configure the mage environment
v1v 2d8d17d
run once the get-version
v1v fd7f48f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feature/beats-tes…
v1v 2da4026
Update .ci/packaging.groovy
v1v 6e1ef08
Fix condition
v1v 528c095
Merge branch 'master' into feature/beats-tester-commit
v1v bffb2ff
Update .ci/packaging.groovy
v1v File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in case of error getting the artifact the build will continue, Is that correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, just wanted to keep the backward compatibility with the existing behaviour, which it's not ideal, but just in case something bad happens when fetching the artifacts from the upstream build, at least the behaviour will remain working