Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Add resilience when peak loads #22674

Merged

Conversation

v1v
Copy link
Member

@v1v v1v commented Nov 19, 2020

What does this PR do?

Avoid as much as possible issues that are caused when the VM provisioner cannot provide such amount of workers concurrently and therefore builds get stuck and get a timeout.

Why is it important?

There were two builds that use the same sha commit, the first build got stuck for 3 hours since apparently there was a peak load, while the second one didn't get stuck.

As long as the provisioner does not scale we need to find ways to mitigate issues with certain adhoc sleeps.

Screenshots

#### Build 1

image

Build 2

image

#### Provisioner graphs

image

@v1v v1v requested a review from a team as a code owner November 19, 2020 15:19
@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Nov 19, 2020
@v1v v1v self-assigned this Nov 19, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Build Cause: [Pull request #22674 opened]

  • Start Time: 2020-11-19T15:20:20.340+0000

  • Duration: 79 min 54 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 16647
Skipped 1366
Total 18013

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

Expand to view the summary

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 16647
Skipped 1366
Total 18013

@v1v v1v merged commit dc05c45 into elastic:master Nov 19, 2020
@v1v v1v deleted the feature/ramp-up-parallel-stages-with-some-latency branch November 19, 2020 17:50
v1v added a commit to v1v/beats that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2020
v1v added a commit to v1v/beats that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automation ci Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants