Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add uuid to indices stats #3437

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2018
Merged

Add uuid to indices stats #3437

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2018

Conversation

Mpdreamz
Copy link
Member

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz commented Oct 1, 2018

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz changed the title Add uuid to indices stats https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pu… Add uuid to indices stats Oct 1, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@russcam russcam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ namespace Nest
[JsonObject]
public class IndicesStats
{
/// <summary>
/// Introduced in 6.4.0, returns the index UUID
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe move Introduced in 6.4.0, into <remarks></remarks>?

/// Introduced in 6.4.0, returns the index UUID
/// </summary>
[JsonProperty("uuid")]
public string Uuid { get; }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be UUID, to match elsewhere?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

@russcam russcam merged commit cdfcc2c into 6.4 Oct 17, 2018
@russcam russcam deleted the feature/indices-stats-uuid branch October 18, 2018 09:45
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants