Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add keywords_pattern to Keyword Marker Token Filter. #3558

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2019

Conversation

codebrain
Copy link
Contributor

Add keywords_pattern to Keyword Marker Token Filter. A regular expression pattern to match against words in the text.

Addresses: #3551

Port to master on merge.
Will be released in 6.6.0

A regular expression pattern to match against words in the text.
Copy link
Member

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM please retarget against 6.6 though 👍

@russcam russcam changed the base branch from 6.x to 6.6 March 5, 2019 05:16
@russcam russcam merged commit 6f6858f into 6.6 Mar 5, 2019
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2019
A regular expression pattern to match against words in the text.

(cherry picked from commit 6f6858f)
@russcam
Copy link
Contributor

russcam commented Mar 5, 2019

ported to master: 6e85885

russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2019
A regular expression pattern to match against words in the text.
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
A regular expression pattern to match against words in the text.
@russcam russcam deleted the feature/add-keywords-pattern branch March 28, 2019 02:52
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2019
A regular expression pattern to match against words in the text.

(cherry picked from commit 74bcbc7)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants