-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
receive _type not indexed error, but documentation says _type is always indexed #31476
Labels
>docs
General docs changes
:Search Foundations/Mapping
Index mappings, including merging and defining field types
Team:Search Foundations
Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch
Comments
javanna
added
the
:Search Foundations/Mapping
Index mappings, including merging and defining field types
label
Jun 21, 2018
Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs |
I think the documentation might be off. Consider this PR that mentions that for single-type indices (which new ones on 6.x are by default) "_type" is no longer indexed). Note that e.g.
|
cbuescher
pushed a commit
to cbuescher/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jul 3, 2018
With the introduction of single types in 6.x, the `_type` field is no longer indexed, which leads to certain queries that were working before throw errors now. One such query is the `range` query, that, if performed on a single typer index, currently throws an IAE since the field is not indexed. This change adds special treatment for this case in the TypeFieldMapper, comparing the range queries lower and upper bound to the one existing type and either returns a MatchAllDocs or a MatchNoDocs query. Relates to elastic#31632 Closes elastic#31476
cbuescher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 18, 2018
With the introduction of single types in 6.x, the `_type` field is no longer indexed, which leads to certain queries that were working before throw errors now. One such query is the `range` query, that, if performed on a single typer index, currently throws an IAE since the field is not indexed. This change adds special treatment for this case in the TypeFieldMapper, comparing the range queries lower and upper bound to the one existing type and either returns a MatchAllDocs or a MatchNoDocs query. Relates to #31632 Closes #31476
cbuescher
pushed a commit
to cbuescher/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jul 18, 2018
…31756) With the introduction of single types in 6.x, the `_type` field is no longer indexed, which leads to certain queries that were working before throw errors now. One such query is the `range` query, that, if performed on a single typer index, currently throws an IAE since the field is not indexed. This change adds special treatment for this case in the TypeFieldMapper, comparing the range queries lower and upper bound to the one existing type and either returns a MatchAllDocs or a MatchNoDocs query. Relates to elastic#31632 Closes elastic#31476
cbuescher
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 23, 2018
…32161) With the introduction of single types in 6.x, the `_type` field is no longer indexed, which leads to certain queries that were working before throw errors now. One such query is the `range` query, that, if performed on a single typer index, currently throws an IAE since the field is not indexed. This change adds special treatment for this case in the TypeFieldMapper, comparing the range queries lower and upper bound to the one existing type and either returns a MatchAllDocs or a MatchNoDocs query. Relates to #31632 Closes #31476
javanna
added
the
Team:Search Foundations
Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch
label
Jul 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>docs
General docs changes
:Search Foundations/Mapping
Index mappings, including merging and defining field types
Team:Search Foundations
Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch version (
bin/elasticsearch --version
):Version: 6.3.0, Build: default/zip/424e937/2018-06-11T23:38:03.357887Z, JVM: 1.8.0_171
Plugins installed: None
JVM version (
java -version
):openjdk version "1.8.0_171"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-8u171-b11-1~bpo8+1-b11)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b11, mixed mode)
OS version (
uname -a
if on a Unix-like system):Linux tony-laptop 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
I run a query on _type field and received HTTP 400 for "cannot search on field [_type] since it is not indexed".
According to the documentation, "The _type field is indexed in order to make searching by type name fast." I expect to receive a correct result not an error.
Steps to reproduce:
Create mappings:
Query:
Response:
I am aware that
_type
is being deprecated. Should the documentation be updated to reflect that_type
is no longer indexed? Or is there a bug?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: