-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GraphExploreResponseTests XContent Tests failing #33686
Comments
Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs |
…ap insertion sequence Closes elastic#33686
@markharwood this seems to fail again but on a different (same?) test in a different project / dir
can you please have a look? It seems this test is a copy and didn't get you fix from #33709 |
@hub-cap Can you give any insight on the need to maintain 2 copies of this test? |
Graph connections could appear in different orders based on insertion sequence Closes #33686
Added fixes for 6.x and master.
These classes are now in sync on 6.x and master but the question remains do we need them both and for how long? |
We should not have 2 copies of the test. Do we have 2 copes of the response? |
ok this is still one of the things i need to fix up, this was one of the request/responses copied into protocol, and copied back when we severed the tie between protocol and client. There is still a cleanup task for me to go back and remove protocol, but im working on splitting the client itself up still. Everything in protocol will go away, and im going to revert back to what the actions looked like in their original locations in the core plugin, so if something is messing up in protocol, nuke it. itll be cleaned up when i nuke it all :) |
I somewhat misspoke. The previous sentence assumes you have some request/response in the HLRC, instead. These classes contain much less than their server counterparts, so they can be simpler. I vote that you move those into HLRC, and revert any changes to the original ones in x-pack (or i will end up doing this eventually hehe) |
@markharwood testFromXContent still fails on 6.x and master (because of different vertices order), can you please take a look? |
On both 6.x and master
|
…rtions but the parsed objects’ .equals() methods have the sort logic required to prove connections and vertices are correct. Disabled the xContent equivalence checks. Closes elastic#33686
API re-uses the GetRequest object (following the precedent set by the plain “exists” api). Relates to elastic#33686
I have seen a few of these fail on different tests. Repros are below. I did not test on 7.0, but this did happen on 6.x
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: