-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't break allocation if resize source index is missing #29311
Merged
ywelsch
merged 2 commits into
elastic:master
from
ywelsch:disk-threshold-missing-source-index
Apr 3, 2018
Merged
Don't break allocation if resize source index is missing #29311
ywelsch
merged 2 commits into
elastic:master
from
ywelsch:disk-threshold-missing-source-index
Apr 3, 2018
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ywelsch
added
>bug
v7.0.0
v6.3.0
:Distributed Coordination/Allocation
All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes)
v5.6.9
labels
Mar 30, 2018
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
dakrone
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2018
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for fixing this
s1monw
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2018
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
ywelsch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2018
DiskThresholdDecider currently assumes that the source index of a resize operation (e.g. shrink) is available, and throws an IndexNotFoundException otherwise, thereby breaking any kind of shard allocation. This can be quite harmful if the source index is deleted during a shrink, or if the source index is unavailable during state recovery. While this behavior has been partly fixed in 6.1 and above (due to #26931), it relies on the order in which AllocationDeciders are executed (i.e. that ResizeAllocationDecider returns NO, ensuring that DiskThresholdDecider does not run, something that for example does not hold for the allocation explain API). This change adds a more complete fix, and also solves the situation for 5.6.
ywelsch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2018
DiskThresholdDecider currently assumes that the source index of a resize operation (e.g. shrink) is available, and throws an IndexNotFoundException otherwise, thereby breaking any kind of shard allocation. This can be quite harmful if the source index is deleted during a shrink, or if the source index is unavailable during state recovery. While this behavior has been partly fixed in 6.1 and above (due to #26931), it relies on the order in which AllocationDeciders are executed (i.e. that ResizeAllocationDecider returns NO, ensuring that DiskThresholdDecider does not run, something that for example does not hold for the allocation explain API). This change adds a more complete fix, and also solves the situation for 5.6.
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2018
* master: Reindex: Fix error in delete-by-query rest spec (elastic#29318) Improve similarity integration. (elastic#29187) Fix some query extraction bugs. (elastic#29283) [Docs] Correct experimental note formatting Move Nullable into core (elastic#29341) [Docs] Update getting-started.asciidoc (elastic#29294) Elasticsearch 6.3.0 is now on Lucene 7.3. [DOCS] Refer back to index API for full-document updates in _update API section (elastic#28677) Fix missing comma in ingest-node.asciidoc (elastic#29343) Improve exception handling on TransportMasterNodeAction (elastic#29314) Don't break allocation if resize source index is missing (elastic#29311) Use fixture to test repository-s3 plugin (elastic#29296) Fix NDCG for empty search results (elastic#29267) Pass through script params in scripted metric agg (elastic#29154) Fix Eclipse build. Upgrade to lucene-7.3.0-snapshot-98a6b3d. (elastic#29298) Painless: Remove extraneous INLINE constant. (elastic#29340)
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2018
* master: Build: Fix Java9 MR build (elastic#29312) Reindex: Fix error in delete-by-query rest spec (elastic#29318) Improve similarity integration. (elastic#29187) Fix some query extraction bugs. (elastic#29283) [Docs] Correct experimental note formatting Move Nullable into core (elastic#29341) [Docs] Update getting-started.asciidoc (elastic#29294) Elasticsearch 6.3.0 is now on Lucene 7.3. [DOCS] Refer back to index API for full-document updates in _update API section (elastic#28677) Fix missing comma in ingest-node.asciidoc (elastic#29343) Improve exception handling on TransportMasterNodeAction (elastic#29314) Don't break allocation if resize source index is missing (elastic#29311) Use fixture to test repository-s3 plugin (elastic#29296) Fix NDCG for empty search results (elastic#29267) Pass through script params in scripted metric agg (elastic#29154) Fix Eclipse build. Upgrade to lucene-7.3.0-snapshot-98a6b3d. (elastic#29298) Painless: Remove extraneous INLINE constant. (elastic#29340) Remove HTTP max content length leniency (elastic#29337) Begin moving XContent to a separate lib/artifact (elastic#29300)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>bug
:Distributed Coordination/Allocation
All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes)
v5.6.9
v6.3.0
v7.0.0-beta1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DiskThresholdDecider
currently assumes that the source index of a resize operation (e.g. shrink) is available, and throws an IndexNotFoundException otherwise, thereby breaking any kind of shard allocation. This can be quite harmful if the source index is deleted during a shrink, or if the source index is unavailable during state recovery.While this behavior has been partly fixed in 6.1 and above (due to #26931), it relies on the order in which AllocationDeciders are executed (i.e. that ResizeAllocationDecider returns
NO
, ensuring that DiskThresholdDecider does not run, something that for example does not hold for the allocation explain API).This change adds a more complete fix, and also solves the situation for 5.6.