Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix repository update with the same settings but different type #31458

Merged
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ private boolean registerRepository(RepositoryMetaData repositoryMetaData) throws
Repository previous = repositories.get(repositoryMetaData.name());
if (previous != null) {
RepositoryMetaData previousMetadata = previous.getMetadata();
if (!previousMetadata.type().equals(repositoryMetaData.type()) && previousMetadata.settings().equals(repositoryMetaData.settings())) {
if (previousMetadata.type().equals(repositoryMetaData.type()) && previousMetadata.settings().equals(repositoryMetaData.settings())) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can just use RepositoryMetaData.equals() here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make sense

// Previous version is the same as this one - ignore it
return false;
}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
/*
* Licensed to Elasticsearch under one or more contributor
* license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright
* ownership. Elasticsearch licenses this file to you under
* the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
* not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
* software distributed under the License is distributed on an
* "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
* KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
* specific language governing permissions and limitations
* under the License.
*/

package org.elasticsearch.repositories;

import org.elasticsearch.action.admin.cluster.repositories.get.GetRepositoriesResponse;
import org.elasticsearch.action.admin.cluster.repositories.put.PutRepositoryResponse;
import org.elasticsearch.client.Client;
import org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.RepositoryMetaData;
import org.elasticsearch.common.settings.Settings;
import org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.NamedXContentRegistry;
import org.elasticsearch.env.Environment;
import org.elasticsearch.plugins.Plugin;
import org.elasticsearch.plugins.RepositoryPlugin;
import org.elasticsearch.repositories.fs.FsRepository;
import org.elasticsearch.test.ESIntegTestCase;
import org.elasticsearch.test.InternalTestCluster;

import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Map;

import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.hasSize;

public class RepositoriesServiceTests extends ESIntegTestCase {

private final static String FAKE_FS_TYPE = "fakeFS";

@Override
protected Collection<Class<? extends Plugin>> nodePlugins() {
return Collections.singletonList(TestFSRepositoryPlugin.class);
}

public static class TestFSRepositoryPlugin extends Plugin implements RepositoryPlugin {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can use MockRepository.Plugin instead of adding a new type of repository


@Override
public Map<String, Repository.Factory> getRepositories(final Environment env, final NamedXContentRegistry registry) {
return Collections.singletonMap(FAKE_FS_TYPE,
(metadata) -> new FsRepository(metadata, env, registry));
}
}

public void testUpdateRepositoryWithDiffType() {
String repositoryName = "test-repo";

Client client = client();
Settings settings = ((InternalTestCluster) cluster()).getDefaultSettings();
Path location = randomRepoPath(settings);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not using randomPath() directly?


Settings.Builder repoSettings = Settings.builder().put(settings).put("location", location);

PutRepositoryResponse putRepositoryResponse1 =
client.admin().cluster().preparePutRepository(repositoryName)
.setType(FsRepository.TYPE)
.setSettings(repoSettings)
.get();
assertThat(putRepositoryResponse1.isAcknowledged(), equalTo(true));

GetRepositoriesResponse getRepositoriesResponse1 =
client.admin().cluster().prepareGetRepositories(repositoryName).get();

assertThat(getRepositoriesResponse1.repositories(), hasSize(1));
RepositoryMetaData repositoryMetaData1 = getRepositoriesResponse1.repositories().get(0);

assertThat(repositoryMetaData1.type(), equalTo(FsRepository.TYPE));

// update repository with different type

PutRepositoryResponse putRepositoryResponse2 =
client.admin().cluster().preparePutRepository(repositoryName)
.setType(FAKE_FS_TYPE)
.setSettings(repoSettings)
.get();
assertThat(putRepositoryResponse2.isAcknowledged(), equalTo(true));

GetRepositoriesResponse getRepositoriesResponse2 =
client.admin().cluster().prepareGetRepositories(repositoryName).get();

assertThat(getRepositoriesResponse2.repositories(), hasSize(1));
RepositoryMetaData repositoryMetaData2 = getRepositoriesResponse2.repositories().get(0);

assertThat(repositoryMetaData2.type(), equalTo(FAKE_FS_TYPE));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering if we should also check the Repository instance itself using internalCluster().getInstance(RepositoriesService.class).repository(name) and check if the instance is the same or has changed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree - make sense to add that kind of check

}
}