Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix CreateSnapshotRequestTests Failure #31630

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 28, 2018

Conversation

jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor

Original test failure found here: (#31625) Had to rework the tests to only include options available externally for create snapshot requests.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra

@jdconrad jdconrad requested a review from talevy June 27, 2018 20:26
@jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hub-cap Thanks for the review! Will commit after CI completes.

@jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@talevy Would you mind taking a look at the toXContent method I added to IndicesOptions and see if it makes sense? I tried to make it equivalent to the fromMap method as that's what will ultimately parse what's written out in toXContent, but I don't know a huge amount about the index options available.

@jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@talevy Would you please review this when you have a chance? Thanks in advance!

Copy link
Contributor

@talevy talevy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jdconrad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@talevy Thanks for the review!

@jdconrad jdconrad merged commit 02c01cb into elastic:master Jun 28, 2018
jdconrad added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2018
Original test failure found here in issue (#31625). Had to rework the tests to only include options available externally for create snapshot requests.
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2018
* master:
  Do not check for object existence when deleting repository index files (#31680)
  Remove extra check for object existence in repository-gcs read object (#31661)
  Support multiple system store types (#31650)
  [Test] Clean up some repository-s3 tests (#31601)
  [Docs] Use capital letters in section headings (#31678)
  [DOCS] Add PQL language Plugin (#31237)
  Merge AzureStorageService and AzureStorageServiceImpl and clean up tests (#31607)
  TEST: Fix test task invocation (#31657)
  Revert "[TEST] Mute failing tests in NativeRealmInteg and ReservedRealmInteg"
  Fix RealmInteg test failures
  Extend allowed characters for grok field names (#21745) (#31653)
  [DOCS] Fix licensing API details (#31667)
  [TEST] Mute failing tests in NativeRealmInteg and ReservedRealmInteg
  Fix CreateSnapshotRequestTests Failure (#31630)
  Configurable password hashing algorithm/cost (#31234)
  [TEST] Mute failing NamingConventionsTaskIT tests
  [DOCS] Replace CONFIG_DIR with ES_PATH_CONF (#31635)
  Core: Require all actions have a Task (#31627)
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2018
* 6.x:
  Do not check for object existence when deleting repository index files (#31680)
  Remove extra check for object existence in repository-gcs read object (#31661)
  [Test] Clean up some repository-s3 tests (#31601)
  Merge AzureStorageService and AzureStorageServiceImpl and clean up tests (#31607)
  [Docs] Use capital letters in section headings (#31678)
  [DOCS] Add PQL language Plugin (#31237)
  [DOCS] Fix licensing API details (#31667)
  Fix CreateSnapshotRequestTests Failure (#31630)
  Add Create Snapshot to High-Level Rest Client (#31215)
  Add MultiSearchTemplate support to High Level Rest client (#31662)
  SQL: Refactor package names of sql-proto and sql-shared-proto projects (#31622)
  [TEST] Mute failing NamingConventionsTaskIT tests
  [DOCS] Replace CONFIG_DIR with ES_PATH_CONF (#31635)
  Add test for low-level client round-robin behaviour (#31616)
  HLRest: Fix test for explain API
  Add explain API to high-level REST client (#31387)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants